Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath has been threatened with a bomb.
Hello India, I am Suraj, I have come today
with a topic. This is very big news. The way you all know. We are going through an epidemic like corona. During that time, some public attention is not to avoid this epidemic, but rather political facts are being talked about keeping in mind. Which by the way is a shameful thing today.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Adityanath has been threatened with a bomb. A threatening message was sent to WhatsApp of 112's social media desk. CM Yogi was described as a threat to a particular community. In this case, the police has registered a case under Section 505 (1) b 506, and 507 in Gomti Nagar Police Station.
After the threat received by CM Yogi Adityanath, an FIR has been lodged by Inspector Dhiraj Kumar. According to Dheeraj Kumar, threatening message was received on WhatsApp number of social media desk of UP 112 on mobile number 8828453350 on 7570000100 on Thursday night at 12:32 pm.
Inspector Dhiraj Kumar said, 'It was written in the message that I will kill Yogi Adityanath with a bomb and kill him. Then he called Yogi an enemy of some people's lives. On checking the number on the true caller, it says, "Hi Guy ... just abusing ..."
Well the police is investigating this mobile number. Police has got many information about the accused. Lucknow Police Commissioner Sujit Pandey said that an FIR is being registered and investigation is being done.
In HINDI
पुलिस कुमार अभिषेक लखनऊ, उत्तर प्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री आदित्यनाथ को बम से उड़ाने की धमकी दी गई है. 112 की सोशल मीडिया डेस्क के वॉट्सऐप पर धमकी भरा मैसेज भेजा गया. एक विशेष समुदाय के लिए सीएम योगी को खतरा बताया गया. गोमती नगर पुलिस ने दर्ज की FIR धमकी देने वाले की तलाश जारी उत्तर प्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री आदित्यनाथ को बम से उड़ाने की धमकी दी गई है. 112 की सोशल मीडिया डेस्क के वॉट्सऐप पर धमकी भरा मैसेज भेजा गया. एक विशेष समुदाय के लिए सीएम योगी को खतरा बताया गया. इस मामले में पुलिस ने गोमती नगर पुलिस स्टेशन में धारा 505(1)b 506,और 507 के तहत मुकदमा दर्ज किया है. सीएम योगी आदित्यनाथ को मिली धमकी के बाद इंस्पेक्टर धीरज कुमार की ओर से एफआईआर दर्ज कराई गई है. धीरज कुमार के मुताबिक, यूपी 112 के सोशल मीडिया डेस्क के व्हाटसएप नम्बर पर 7570000100 पर मोबाइल नम्बर 8828453350 से गुरुवार रात 12:32 पर धमकी भरा मैसज आया. इंस्पेक्टर धीरज कुमार ने कहा, 'मैसेज में लिखा था कि मैं योगी आदित्यनाथ को बम से हमला कर जान से मार दूंगा. फिर उसने योगी को कुछ लोगों की जान का दुश्मन बताया. ट्रू कॉलर पर इस नम्बर को चेक करने पर लिखा आता है- हाय गॉय...जस्ट एबुसिंग...।' खैर पुलिस इस मोबाइल नंबर की पड़ताल कर रही है. आरोपी के बारे में कई जानकारी पुलिस को मिल गई है. लखनऊ के पुलिस कमिश्नर सुजीत पाण्डेय ने बताया कि एफआईआर दर्ज कर पड़ताल की जा रही है।
🙏🙏
You are requested to follow the website, so that I am motive to bring such blogs and come to you by bringing new information for you!
Coronavirus Is Very Different From the Spanish Flu of 1918. Here’s How.
The fear is similar, but the medical reality is not.
Image
Seattle policemen wearing protective gauze face masks during the influenza pandemic. 1918.Credit...Time Life Pictures/National Archives, via The LIFE Picture Collection, via Getty Images
It was a disease so awful that it terrified people for generations.
The 1918 flu pandemic, thought to be the deadliest in human history, killed at least 50 million people worldwide (the equivalent of 200 million today), with half a million of those in the United States. It spread to every part of the world, affecting populations in Japan, Argentina, Germany and dozens of other countries.
Maybe most alarmingly, a majority of those killed by the disease were in the prime of life — often in their 20s, 30s and 40s — rather than older people weakened by other medical conditions.
As the coronavirus spreads around the world and public anxieties spike, comparisons between today’s situation and the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918 are proliferating in journalisticoutletsand on social media.
ADVERTISEMENT
While the fearful atmosphere — surgical masks, stockpiling of food and avoidance of public gatherings — and potential economic ramifications are like those of 1918, the medical reality is quite different.
Image
Nurses and others in Chippendale, New South Wales, Australia. 1919.Credit...ART Collection/Alamy
Image
Japanese schoolgirls. Feb. 17, 1920.Credit...Bettmann/Getty Images
“Nurses often walked into scenes resembling those of the plague years of the fourteenth century,” wrote the historian Alfred W. Crosby in “America’s Forgotten Pandemic.” “One nurse found a husband dead in the same room where his wife lay with newly born twins. It had been twenty-four hours since the death and the births, and the wife had had no food but an apple which happened to lie within reach.”
In 1918, the world was a very different place, even without the disruptive influence of World War I. Doctors knew viruses existed but had never seen one — there were no electron microscopes, and the genetic material of viruses had not yet been discovered. Today, however, researchers not only know how to isolate a virus but can find its genetic sequence, test antiviral drugs and develop a vaccine.
In 1918, it was impossible to test people with mild symptoms so they could self-quarantine. And it was nearly impossible to do contact tracing because the flu seemed to infect — and panic — entire cities and communities all at once. Moreover, there was little protective equipment for health care workers, and the supportive care with respirators that can be provided to people very ill with coronavirus did not exist.
ADVERTISEMENT
With a case fatality rate of at least 2.5 percent, the 1918 flu was far more deadly than ordinary flu, and it was so infectious that it spread widely, which meant the number of deaths soared.
Researchers believe the 1918 flu spared older people because they had some immunity to it. They theorize that decades earlier there had been a version of that virus, one that was not as lethal and spread like an ordinary flu. The older people living in 1918 would have been exposed to that less lethal flu and developed antibodies. As for children, most viral illnesses — measles, chickenpox — are more deadly in young adults, which may explain why the youngest were spared in the 1918 epidemic.
Regardless of the reason, it was a disaster for life expectancy, which plummeted. In 1917, life expectancy in the United States was 51 years. It was the same in 1919. But in 1918, it was just 39 years.
The new coronavirus tends to kill older people and those with underlying medical conditions, and it does not seem to kill children. All of which means it will have far less effect, if any, on life expectancy.
ADVERTISEMENT
As for the coronavirus case fatality rate, it is not yet known, but the latest data from South Korea, with 7,478 confirmed infections, show a rate significantly higher than the seasonal flu. After testing 100,000 people for the virus, the country appears to have a case fatality rate of .65 percent.(Though the data is evolving as researchers in other countries track cases.)
Image
An image of a Red Cross nurse published in Illustrated Current News. 1918.Credit...National Library of Medicine
What the current situation does have in common with 1918, though, is the tenor of public concern.
Among the first places the 1918 flu arrived in the United States was Fort Devens, near Boston. So many young soldiers were sick, and so many were dying, that the Surgeon General sent four of the nation’s leading doctors to investigate.
One of them, Dr. Victor Vaughan, later recalled: “Hundreds of stalwart young men in the uniform of their country, coming into the wards of the hospital in groups of ten or more. They are placed on the cots until every bed is full, yet others crowd in. Their faces soon wear a bluish cast; a distressing cough brings up the blood stained sputum. In the morning the dead bodies are stacked about the morgue like cord wood.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Accounts like these scared Americans deeply.
Image
A flier published by the Chicago Department of Health.Credit...National Library of Medicine
Image
An article from The New York Times. Oct. 5, 1918.Credit...The New York Times
On Oct. 3, 1918, Philadelphia closed all schools, churches, theaters, pool halls and other gathering places. Undertakers were overwhelmed — some funeral homes increased their prices sixfold and some even made the bereaved bury their own dead.
In Tucson, Ariz., the board of health forbade people to venture out in public without a mask. In Albuquerque, where schools and theaters were closed, a local newspaper wrote, “the ghost of fear walked everywhere.”
Similar actions are being taken today. Seattle has closed some public schools. The South by Southwest festival in Austin, Tex., has been canceled. Apple asked employees to work from home. More than 2,700 people are under some sort of quarantine in New York City. And some Costco stores are having trouble keeping bottled water in stock.
ADVERTISEMENT
But so far this year, the annual epidemic of seasonal flu in the United States is proving much more devastating than the coronavirus.
For the economy, the effects of the 1918 flu, despite factory closings and social disruptions, were hard to disentangle from the profound ones of World War I. The world was not as interconnected as it is today, and by the summer of 1919, the pandemic had ended.
Coronavirus is already having significant impacts on the stock market and other aspects of the economy, but the long-term consequences remain to be seen.
Gina Kolata writes about science and medicine. She has twice been a Pulitzer Prize finalist and is the author of six books, including “Mercies in Disguise: A Story of Hope, a Family's Genetic Destiny, and The Science That Saved Them.” @ginakolata•Facebook
Correction: March 10, 2020
An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the case fatality rate of the coronavirus. The case fatality rate for those infected with the coronavirus is significantly higher than that of the season flu; it is not comparable with it. The earlier version also misstated the given name of one of the doctors who visited Fort Devens. He is Victor Vaughan, not William Vaughan.